Covid-19 Will Further Widen New Generation Of Inequality.
COVID-19 Will Further Widen New
Generation of Inequality
Shashank Vikram Pratap Singh
PhD Scholar
Department of Commerce
Delhi School of Economics
University of
Delhi.
&
Rana Vishal Vikram Pratap Singh
Professional Banker and Associated with Yes Bank Ltd.
The third decades of the 21st century
are witnessing the biggest scatting, deadly, and the most cowardly attack on
humanity. Covid-19 has hugely affected the lives and livelihoods of billions of
people across the world at a time when the advancement and supremacy of science
and technology are the most pressing subject matters for nations to distinguish
and illustrate their dominance and power among low and high human development
nations. This technological advancement has become the reason for a new form of
inequalities among low and high developed countries in this 21st century. The
enormous and more intensified impact of Covid-19 on humanity is further going
to deepen this New Generation of Inequality (NGI).
As per UNDP (United Nations Development
Programme), NGI viewed as, seeing the magnitude and intensity of inequality
beyond the prism of income and wealth and deals with inequality in health,
education, and other human-centric aspect of people’s life. So basically, it is
Amartya Sen’s capability centric approach which makes a plethora of choices in
people’s life. Thus, viewing inequality within the enhanced capabilities of
people is called the New Generation of Inequality.
People have many dimensions of life
which cannot be defined only with resources and its price. An individual would
be better off even having fever resources but having higher abilities for
achievement in life's valuable domains. In support of this argument here is
what Sen said while delivering a lecture at the central hall of Cambridge
University in 1985 “we could be well off without being well, we could
be well without being able to lead the life we wanted, we could have got the
life we wanted without being happy”.
Capabilities are at the heart of human
development. There are two sets of capabilities -basic capabilities and
enhanced capabilities. Achieving both these capabilities are equally important
for increasing and achieving high human development, good state of being, and
overall human wellbeing.
As per UNDP classification, the
examples of basic capabilities achievement are; early childhood survival,
primary education, entry-level technology, resilience to recurrent shocks, and
many more. Furthermore, the standard of enhanced capabilities achievements is;
access to quality health at all levels, high-quality education at all levels,
effective access to present-day technologies, resilience to unknown new shocks.
The 21st century has witnessed
unprecedented improvement in the standards of living almost everywhere in the
world. The economic wellbeing, measured by GDP per capita, doubled in the poor
countries. Child mortality has halved relative to 1990s, and the proportion of
children attending school has increased from 56 per cent to 80 per cent
globally. People having low human development fell from 3 billion to 926
million or 60 per cent of world
population to 12 per cent. People having high and very high human development
rise from 1.3 billion to 3.8 billion or 24 per cent of the global population to
51 per cent of the population.
Despite having such chest thumbing
achievement, still, there are considerable differences among the key elements
of human development between low and high development countries.
Basic and Enhanced Capabilities In Low
and High Development Countries.
The differences in life expectancy
at birth between the low (59.4 years) and very high (78.4) development
countries is 19 years. Such differences in expected longevity persist at every
age.
At the age of 70, the life expectancy of low human
development countries is 9.8 years as compared to 14.6 years in very high human
development countries. Same as the case with primary and tertiary education.
In low development countries, only
42.3 per cent of adults have primary education as compared to 93.5 per cent in
very high development countries. In the case of tertiary education, only 3.2
per cent of adults have tertiary education compared to 28.6 per cent in high
development countries.
The statistics is highly skewed in
case of access to technology measured through mobile-cellular subscription and
fixed broadband subscriptions per 100 inhabitants. There are only 67 mobile
phone subscribers in low human development counties compared to 131.6 in very
high human development countries. And in
the case of fixed-broadband subscriptions, less than one subscriptions (0.80)
in low development countries compared to 28.3 in very high development
countries.
The most sensitive data of world poverty
is still massive, which is like this; 600 million people still living in
extreme income poverty and it increases to 1.3 billion when measured through
Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI). Around 262 million children are out of
primary or secondary school, and 5.4 million children do not survive their
first five years of life.
Convergence in Basic Capabilities
The inequalities in basic
capabilities are shrinking across the counties among all levels of development.
But at the same time, inequalities in enhanced capabilities are rising, i.e.
new generation of inequalities are widening.
From the year 2005 to 2015, the low
human development countries registered the growth in life expectancy at birth
(5.9 years) which is almost three times more than the high development nation
(2.4 years).
In the case of a share of the population
with primary education, in the low development countries, the change from 2007
to 2017 registered to 5.3 per cent compared to 3 per cent in very high human
development countries. During the same period, the growth in mobile- cellular
subscriptions per 100 inhabitants in low human development countries is 49.3%
as compared to 26.1% in very high development countries.
A new set of Inequality in Enhanced
Capabilities
Despite conversance in basic
capabilities, inequalities in enhanced capabilities have widened across all
human development groups. From the year 2005 to 2015, in the case of life
expectancy at age 70, only 0.50 years changes have registered in low developed
nations compared to 1.2 years in very high development countries.
In the case of the share of the
population with tertiary education, 1.1 per cent point has increased in low
development nations compared to 7.1 per cent in a very high development nation
from the year 2007 to 2017. It means a very high development nation is growing
more than six times faster than low development countries.
Same as the case with the fixed
broadband subscription. From the year 2007 to 2017, 0.80 out of per 100
inhabitants has registered in the low developed nation. While it is 12.3 per
100 in a very high development nation, it means in the very high development
countries it is growing 15 times faster than in low development countries.
There is the convergence in the basic
capabilities after the second decades of the 21st century - the target agenda
through which HDI stated way back in 1990. But now there is the divergence in
the new set of indicators which is termed as enhanced capabilities, and these
differences are quite dramatic and enormous.
The countries lagging in these indicators
might lose the new opportunities of the 21st century. That too, at a time when
the world is witnessing the blink of the technological revolution.
Whatever we see today in the
form of technological revolution, it is just a blink; this is what Microsoft CEO,
Satya Nadella wrote in his book Hit Refresh. The enormous impact of
technological revolution and the digital divide among nations is yet to be seen
and analysed with the prism of the new generation of inequalities.
Power of Human Development
In its very first report, UNDP defined
human development as "it is the process of enlarging people's choices.
The most critical of these wide ranges- ranging choices are to live a long and
healthy life, to be educated, and to have access to resources needed for a
decent standard of living. Additional choices include political freedom,
guaranteed human rights, and personal self-respect''.
Precisely after the 30 years of its
first report, UNDP illustrates the power of human development trough very
fascinating factual data which is like this: in the year 2000 a child born in
high human development nation and one in low development countries, exactly
after 20 years the following changes have been estimated by UNDP in both the
types of countries.
In the low human development
counties, the 17 per cent of children will die before the age of 20 years as
compared to just only 1 per cent in case of high development countries. 80% per
cent children are not in the higher education as compare to 44 per cent in high
development countries that means only 3 per cent (100-80+17=3) children
enrolled in higher education as compared to 55 per cent (100-44+1=55) in high
human development countries.
The disruption caused by COVID-19 is
vast and beyond calculation. Non-availability of any scientifically approved
medicine and the nature of exponential growth of spreading of COVID-19, has
forced the governments and concerned authorities across the world to weaponize
the physical distancing among people via lock down the whole country to combat
over it. This causes a new set of socio-economic disorder. Be it
teaching-learning process via online mode, or accumulating the essential
commodities, or reverse order migration from industrial centric cities towards
villages and many more, all dented the old setups and draw a line between the
haves and have nots. After this invincible COVID-19 new set of world orders and
so-called new normal further going the dent the new generation of inequalities
across the world.
Note- The Data Used in the Article has
taken from UNDP.
Comments
Post a Comment